Make.com vs Otter.ai: Complete Comparison 2026
Choosing between Make.com and Otter.ai? We compare both tools across features, pricing, pros and cons to help you decide which is the better fit in 2026.
Make · Productivity
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform whose flowchart-style builder makes complex, branching workflows easy to design. With AI modules and connections to thousands of apps, it powers sophisticated automations that go beyond simple triggers. Make appeals to power users who want granular control over their automation logic.
Otter.ai · Productivity
Otter.ai is an AI meeting assistant that joins calls to transcribe, summarise and capture action items in real time. Its OtterPilot can automatically attend Zoom, Meet and Teams meetings, generating searchable notes and highlights. Otter is widely used by teams who want accurate, automatic meeting records.
Key differences at a glance
- •Make.com scores higher overall (8.4 vs 8.2).
- •Both start at $9/mo (Make.com) and $16.99/mo (Otter.ai).
- •Make.com leans on powerful visual builder.
- •Otter.ai leans on accurate live transcription.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Make.comMake | Otter.aiOtter.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 8.4 / 10 | 8.2 / 10 |
| Starting price | $9/mo | $16.99/mo |
| Free tier | Yes — Free tier available | Yes — Free tier available |
| API input price | — | — |
| API output price | — | — |
| Speed | Fast | Fast |
| Context window | — | — |
| Categories | Productivity | Productivity |
| Key features |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Specs compared
Make.com holds the higher quality score (8.4 vs 8.2 out of 10).
On modality, only Make.com lists image/vision input and only Otter.ai lists audio or voice support, based on their published features.
Make.com
Choose Make.com if you want powerful visual builder and a free tier to start.
Otter.ai
Choose Otter.ai if you want accurate live transcription and a free tier to start.
Pricing comparison
On monthly plans, Make.com is the cheaper option at $9/mo — roughly 47% less than Otter.ai's $16.99/mo.
Both offer a free tier, so you can try each before paying for anything.
Which should you choose?
The right pick depends on what you're optimising for. Here's how Make.com and Otter.ai line up against the priorities that usually decide it.
- →On a tight budget, Make.com is the lower-cost choice to start with.
- →If top overall quality matters most, Make.com edges ahead on our score.
- →If you need image or vision input, choose Make.com.
- →If audio or voice is part of your workflow, Otter.ai is the one that supports it.
The verdict
Overall, Make.com edges ahead with a quality score of 8.4 versus 8.2 for Otter.ai. Choose Make.com if you want powerful visual builder. That said, Otter.ai is the better pick when accurate live transcription matters most — so the right answer depends on your priorities and budget.
Frequently asked questions
Q. Which is better, Make.com or Otter.ai?
On our scoring, Make.com edges ahead (8.4/10), but the right pick depends on your priorities and budget — see the breakdown above.
Q. Is Make.com or Otter.ai cheaper?
Make.com starts at $9/mo and Otter.ai at $16.99/mo. Check current rates before committing.
Q. Can I use Make.com and Otter.ai together?
Yes — many teams use more than one AI tool, picking Make.com for some tasks and Otter.ai for others where it's stronger.