Overview
Gemma 3n E4B-it is optimized for efficient execution on mobile and low-resource devices, such as phones, laptops, and tablets. It supports multimodal inputs—including text, visual data, and audio—enabling diverse tasks...
How Google: Gemma 3n 4B stacks up
Among the 368 chatbots & llms tools in our directory, it ranks #343 of 355 on quality (6.5/10), 18% below the 355-tool average of 8.0, and its $0.06/1M input-token rate is in the budget end — 96% cheaper than the 345-model average of $1.58/1M.
Weighing quality against cost, Google: Gemma 3n 4B's cost-per-quality-point of $0.01 places it in the top 9% for value among chatbots & llms tools.
Google: Gemma 3n 4B in depth
Google: Gemma 3n 4B, built by Google, sits in the chatbots & llms space and is a paid tool starting at $0.06/1M tokens. Our editors rate it 6.5 out of 10 based on capability, ecosystem and value. It handles a context window of 32,768 tokens.
On the feature side, Google: Gemma 3n 4B brings 32,768-token context window, structured (json) outputs and knowledge cutoff 2024-08-31. These are the capabilities that most shape day-to-day use and separate it from thinner alternatives.
Its biggest strength is low api price — $0.06 per 1m input tokens, cheaper than roughly 75% of comparable models, while the main trade-off to weigh is that no free tier — usage is billed per token. Keep both in mind when deciding whether it fits your workflow.
Google: Gemma 3n 4B is most often chosen for research and writing. If that matches your goals, it's a strong candidate to shortlist.
Key features
- ✓32,768-token context window
- ✓Structured (JSON) outputs
- ✓Knowledge cutoff 2024-08-31
Pricing
Pros
- +Low API price — $0.06 per 1M input tokens, cheaper than roughly 75% of comparable models
- +Can return structured JSON output for reliable parsing
Cons
- −No free tier — usage is billed per token
- −Context window of 32,768 tokens is smaller than most current models
- −Text-only: does not accept image input
Who should use Google: Gemma 3n 4B
- →Anyone looking for a chatbots & llms tool from Google.
- →Teams and individuals focused on research and writing.
- →People who value low api price — $0.06 per 1m input tokens, cheaper than roughly 75% of comparable models.
- →Workflows that need a 32,768 tokens context window.
Who should look elsewhere
- →Anyone who needs a free tier — this tool is paid only.
- →Those for whom no free tier — usage is billed per token is a dealbreaker.
- →Users who can't accept that context window of 32,768 tokens is smaller than most current models.
Best for
10 Best Google: Gemma 3n 4B Alternatives in 2026
Google: Gemma 3n 4B is a strong chatbots & llms tool, but it is not the only option. Whether you are after a lower price, different features or a better fit for your workflow, here are the 10 best alternatives to Google: Gemma 3n 4B, ranked and compared.
Anthropic
Claude is Anthropic's family of AI assistants, known for long-context reasoning, careful writing and strong coding…
OpenAI
ChatGPT is OpenAI's flagship conversational AI, powering hundreds of millions of weekly users across web, mobile and…
Google DeepMind
Gemini is Google's natively multimodal model family, deeply integrated across Search, Workspace, Android and the Pixel…
Gemini 3.7 Flash is a multimodal model from Google for fast agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step…
Meta
Muse Spark 1.2 is a reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex agentic tasks.
Qwen
Qwen3.8 Max is the flagship model in Alibaba's Qwen3.8 series, the general-availability successor to the Qwen3.8 Max…
Qwen
Qwen3.7 Flash is a vision-language reasoning model from Alibaba. It is suited for multimodal agents, visual coding…
Anthropic
Fast-mode variant of [Opus 5](/anthropic/claude-opus-5) - identical capabilities with higher output speed at 2x pricing…
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work.
Gemini 3.6 Flash is a high-efficiency model from Google for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.
Google: Gemma 3n 4B vs top alternatives
A side-by-side look at how Google: Gemma 3n 4B stacks up against its closest rivals.
| Feature | Google: Gemma 3n 4BGoogle | ClaudeAnthropic | ChatGPTOpenAI | GeminiGoogle DeepMind |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 6.5 / 10 | 9.6 / 10 | 9.5 / 10 | 9.2 / 10 |
| Starting price | $0.06/1M tokens | $20/mo | $20/mo | $20/mo |
| Free tier | No | Yes — Free tier available | Yes — Free tier available | Yes — Free tier available |
| API input price | $0.06 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | $0.1 / 1M tokens | $0.1875 / 1M tokens |
| API output price | $0.12 / 1M tokens | $50 / 1M tokens | $0.6 / 1M tokens | $0.9375 / 1M tokens |
| Speed | — | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 200K tokens | 128K tokens | 1M-2M tokens |
| Categories | Chatbots & LLMs | Chatbots & LLMs, Coding, Writing | Chatbots & LLMs, Coding, Writing | Chatbots & LLMs, Coding, Writing |
| Key features |
|
|
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
|
Frequently asked questions
Q. Is Google: Gemma 3n 4B free?
No — Google: Gemma 3n 4B is a paid tool, starting at $0.06/1M tokens.
Q. How much does Google: Gemma 3n 4B cost?
Google: Gemma 3n 4B starts at $0.06/1M tokens. API usage is around $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.12 per 1M output tokens.
Q. What is Google: Gemma 3n 4B best for?
Google: Gemma 3n 4B is best suited to research and writing, within the chatbots & llms category.
Q. What are the best Google: Gemma 3n 4B alternatives?
Popular alternatives to Google: Gemma 3n 4B include Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini and Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch). Each trades off price, quality and ecosystem differently.
Q. Is there a free alternative to Google: Gemma 3n 4B?
Yes. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini offer a free tier, making them good starting points if you want to avoid an upfront subscription.
Q. Why switch from Google: Gemma 3n 4B?
Common reasons include pricing, specific feature gaps (No free tier — usage is billed per token; Context window of 32,768 tokens is smaller than most current models; Text-only: does not accept image input), data-privacy requirements, or simply wanting a tool that fits your stack better.
How we rate AI tools
Our quality score weighs capability on real tasks, breadth of features and integrations, pricing and value, and how actively the tool is maintained. Scores are editorial guidance, not benchmarks — always trial a tool on your own workflow before committing. Pricing and features change frequently, so verify current details on the official site.
Ready to try Google: Gemma 3n 4B?
Start with the official plans and upgrade as you grow.
Visit Google: Gemma 3n 4B →