AIAIFindr.app
Me

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

by Meta

9.2
Quality score / 10

Overview

Muse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text, with a 1M-token context...

Our take

Among the current crop of multimodal AI models, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 distinguishes itself by its focus on agentic tasks. Unlike alternatives such as Google's Gemini series or Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5, which are primarily listed as AI video tools, Muse Spark 1.1 integrates a substantial 1,048,576-token context window and explicit reasoning capabilities. This makes it particularly suited for complex analytical tasks, such as synthesising findings from a large PDF document alongside visual data to inform a research report. Its support for tool and function calling, coupled with structured JSON outputs, positions it for developers building automated workflows where precise data extraction and external system interaction are paramount. Ideal for those who need to process varied inputs and generate structured responses for agent-style applications. However, with no free tier, those with limited budgets or simple text generation needs might find its token-based billing less appealing.

How Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 stacks up

Among the 57 video & audio tools in our directory, it ranks #1 of 37 on quality (9.2/10), 9% above the 37-tool average of 8.5, and its $1.25/1M input-token rate is in the mid-price range — 40% pricier than the 21-model average of $0.89/1M.

Weighing quality against cost, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1's cost-per-quality-point of $0.14 places it in the top 50% for value among video & audio tools.

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 in depth

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1, built by Meta, sits in the video & audio and chatbots & llms space and is a paid tool starting at $1.25/1M tokens. Our editors rate it 9.2 out of 10 based on capability, ecosystem and value. It handles a context window of 1,048,576 tokens.

On the feature side, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 brings 1,048,576-token context window, vision (image input), reasoning / chain-of-thought and tool / function calling. These are the capabilities that most shape day-to-day use and separate it from thinner alternatives.

Its biggest strength is large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here, while the main trade-off to weigh is that no free tier — usage is billed per token. Keep both in mind when deciding whether it fits your workflow.

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 is most often chosen for content creation, research and writing. If that matches your goals, it's a strong candidate to shortlist.

Speed
Context window
1,048,576 tokens
Free tier
No
Updated
2026-07-17

Key features

  • 1,048,576-token context window
  • Vision (image input)
  • Reasoning / chain-of-thought
  • Tool / function calling
  • Structured (JSON) outputs

Pricing

$1.25/1M tokens
Pay per token
Paid$1.25/1M tokens
API input
$1.25 / 1M tokens
API output
$4.25 / 1M tokens
See full API pricing → llmprice.app

Pros

  • +Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here
  • +Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems
  • +Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
  • +Supports tool / function calling for agent-style workflows

Cons

  • No free tier — usage is billed per token

Who should use Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

  • Anyone looking for a video & audio and chatbots & llms tool from Meta.
  • Teams and individuals focused on content creation, research and writing.
  • People who value large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here.
  • Workflows that need a 1,048,576 tokens context window.

Who should look elsewhere

  • Anyone who needs a free tier — this tool is paid only.
  • Those for whom no free tier — usage is billed per token is a dealbreaker.

Best for

10 Best Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 Alternatives in 2026

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 is a strong video & audio tool, but it is not the only option. Whether you are after a lower price, different features or a better fit for your workflow, here are the 10 best alternatives to Meta: Muse Spark 1.1, ranked and compared.

1
Google: Gemini 3.5 FlashPaid$1.50/1M tokens

Google

Gemini 3.5 Flash is Google's high-efficiency multimodal model, bringing near-Pro level coding and reasoning at…

+ Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
Read full Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash review →
2

Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is Google’s GA high-efficiency multimodal model optimized for low-latency, high-volume workloads.

+ Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
Read full Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite review →
3
Google Gemini Pro LatestPaid$2.00/1M tokens

~google

This model always redirects to the latest model in the Google Gemini Pro family.

+ Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
Read full Google Gemini Pro Latest review →
4
Google Gemini Flash LatestPaid$1.50/1M tokens

~google

This model always redirects to the latest model in the Google Gemini Flash family.

+ Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
Read full Google Gemini Flash Latest review →
5
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5Paid$0.14/1M tokens

Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.5 is a native omnimodal model by Xiaomi. It delivers Pro-level agentic performance at roughly half the…

+ Low API price — $0.14 per 1M input tokens, cheaper than roughly 75% of comparable models+ Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems
Read full Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 review →
6
ClaudeFree tier$20/mo

Anthropic

Claude is Anthropic's family of AI assistants, known for long-context reasoning, careful writing and strong coding…

+ Best-in-class long-document reasoning+ Natural, high-quality writing+ Strong safety and reliability
Read full Claude review →
7
ChatGPTFree tier$20/mo

OpenAI

ChatGPT is OpenAI's flagship conversational AI, powering hundreds of millions of weekly users across web, mobile and…

+ Most polished and widely supported ecosystem+ Excellent general reasoning and coding+ Huge third-party integration support
Read full ChatGPT review →
8
GeminiFree tier$20/mo

Google DeepMind

Gemini is Google's natively multimodal model family, deeply integrated across Search, Workspace, Android and the Pixel…

+ Massive context window+ Tight integration with Google ecosystem+ Generous free access
Read full Gemini review →
9
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3Paid$3.00/1M tokens

Moonshot AI

Kimi K3 is a 2.8T parameter open-weight multimodal reasoning model from Moonshot AI.

+ Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
Read full MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 review →
10
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna ProPaid$1.00/1M tokens

OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-5.6 Luna](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.6-luna), served with…

+ Large 1,050,000-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
Read full OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro review →

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs top alternatives

A side-by-side look at how Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 stacks up against its closest rivals.

FeatureMeta: Muse Spark 1.1MetaGoogle: Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogleGoogle Gemini Pro Latest~google
Quality score9.2 / 109.2 / 109.2 / 109.2 / 10
Starting price$1.25/1M tokens$1.50/1M tokens$0.25/1M tokens$2.00/1M tokens
Free tierNoNoNoNo
API input price$1.25 / 1M tokens$1.5 / 1M tokens$0.25 / 1M tokens$2 / 1M tokens
API output price$4.25 / 1M tokens$9 / 1M tokens$1.5 / 1M tokens$12 / 1M tokens
Speed
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
CategoriesVideo & Audio, Chatbots & LLMsVideo & Audio, Chatbots & LLMsVideo & Audio, Chatbots & LLMsVideo & Audio, Chatbots & LLMs
Key features
  • 1,048,576-token context window
  • Vision (image input)
  • Reasoning / chain-of-thought
  • Tool / function calling
  • 1,048,576-token context window
  • Vision (image input)
  • Reasoning / chain-of-thought
  • Tool / function calling
  • 1,048,576-token context window
  • Vision (image input)
  • Reasoning / chain-of-thought
  • Tool / function calling
  • 1,048,576-token context window
  • Vision (image input)
  • Reasoning / chain-of-thought
  • Tool / function calling
Pros
  • + Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here
  • + Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems
  • + Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
  • + Supports tool / function calling for agent-style workflows
  • + Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here
  • + Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems
  • + Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
  • + Supports tool / function calling for agent-style workflows
  • + Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here
  • + Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems
  • + Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
  • + Supports tool / function calling for agent-style workflows
  • + Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here
  • + Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems
  • + Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
  • + Supports tool / function calling for agent-style workflows
Cons
  • No free tier — usage is billed per token
  • No free tier — usage is billed per token
  • No free tier — usage is billed per token
  • Above-average API pricing ($2 per 1M input tokens)

Frequently asked questions

Q. Is Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 free?

No — Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 is a paid tool, starting at $1.25/1M tokens.

Q. How much does Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 cost?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 starts at $1.25/1M tokens. API usage is around $1.25 per 1M input tokens and $4.25 per 1M output tokens.

Q. What is Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 best for?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 is best suited to content creation, research and writing, within the video & audio and chatbots & llms category.

Q. What are the best Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 alternatives?

Popular alternatives to Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 include Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash, Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, Google Gemini Pro Latest and Google Gemini Flash Latest. Each trades off price, quality and ecosystem differently.

Q. Is there a free alternative to Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

Yes. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini offer a free tier, making them good starting points if you want to avoid an upfront subscription.

Q. Why switch from Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

Common reasons include pricing, specific feature gaps (No free tier — usage is billed per token), data-privacy requirements, or simply wanting a tool that fits your stack better.

How we rate AI tools

Our quality score weighs capability on real tasks, breadth of features and integrations, pricing and value, and how actively the tool is maintained. Scores are editorial guidance, not benchmarks — always trial a tool on your own workflow before committing. Pricing and features change frequently, so verify current details on the official site.

Ready to try Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

Start with the official plans and upgrade as you grow.

Visit Meta: Muse Spark 1.1