AIAIFindr.app
A

A scorecard for the AI age

by OpenAI

Overview

Sarah Friar, CFO of OpenAI, introduces a practical AI scorecard to measure ROI through useful work, cost per successful task, dependability, and return on compute.

Our take

This tool is not aimed at end-users seeking a conversational AI, but rather at business leaders and financial professionals. Unlike direct AI chatbot alternatives such as Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3, which focus on generating content or providing information, this offering from OpenAI provides a framework for evaluating AI investments. Specifically, it introduces a scorecard to measure return on investment through metrics like useful work, cost per successful task, dependability, and return on compute. This makes it ideal for organisations that have already adopted AI solutions and need a structured method to quantify their effectiveness and financial impact, rather than a tool for direct AI interaction. Those looking for an AI video tool, such as Thinking Machines: Inkling, will find no utility here. Therefore, this is a niche offering for strategic AI oversight, not operational use.

A scorecard for the AI age in depth

A scorecard for the AI age, built by OpenAI, sits in the chatbots & llms space and is a paid tool starting at See site.

Speed
Context window
Free tier
No
Updated
2026-07-19

Key features

    Pricing

    See site
    See provider
    PaidSee site
    See full API pricing → llmprice.app

    Pros

      Cons

        Who should use A scorecard for the AI age

        • Anyone looking for a chatbots & llms tool from OpenAI.

        Who should look elsewhere

        • Anyone who needs a free tier — this tool is paid only.

        Best for

        10 Best A scorecard for the AI age Alternatives in 2026

        A scorecard for the AI age is a strong chatbots & llms tool, but it is not the only option. Whether you are after a lower price, different features or a better fit for your workflow, here are the 10 best alternatives to A scorecard for the AI age, ranked and compared.

        1
        ClaudeFree tier$20/mo

        Anthropic

        Claude is Anthropic's family of AI assistants, known for long-context reasoning, careful writing and strong coding…

        + Best-in-class long-document reasoning+ Natural, high-quality writing+ Strong safety and reliability
        Read full Claude review →
        2
        ChatGPTFree tier$20/mo

        OpenAI

        ChatGPT is OpenAI's flagship conversational AI, powering hundreds of millions of weekly users across web, mobile and…

        + Most polished and widely supported ecosystem+ Excellent general reasoning and coding+ Huge third-party integration support
        Read full ChatGPT review →
        3
        GeminiFree tier$20/mo

        Google DeepMind

        Gemini is Google's natively multimodal model family, deeply integrated across Search, Workspace, Android and the Pixel…

        + Massive context window+ Tight integration with Google ecosystem+ Generous free access
        Read full Gemini review →
        4
        Thinking Machines: InklingPaid$1.00/1M tokens

        Thinkingmachines

        Inkling is an open-weight multimodal mixture-of-experts model from Thinking Machines Lab, with 41B active parameters…

        + Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
        Read full Thinking Machines: Inkling review →
        5
        MoonshotAI: Kimi K3Paid$3.00/1M tokens

        Moonshot AI

        Kimi K3 is a 2.8T parameter open-weight multimodal reasoning model from Moonshot AI.

        + Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
        Read full MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 review →
        6
        Meta: Muse Spark 1.1Paid$1.25/1M tokens

        Meta

        Muse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks.

        + Large 1,048,576-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
        Read full Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 review →
        7
        OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna ProPaid$1.00/1M tokens

        OpenAI

        GPT-5.6 Luna Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-5.6 Luna](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.6-luna), served with…

        + Large 1,050,000-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
        Read full OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro review →
        8
        OpenAI: GPT-5.6 LunaPaid$1.00/1M tokens

        OpenAI

        GPT-5.6 Luna is a fast, cost-efficient model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series. It is suited for high-volume…

        + Large 1,050,000-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
        Read full OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna review →
        9
        OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra ProPaid$2.50/1M tokens

        OpenAI

        GPT-5.6 Terra Pro is the same underlying model as [GPT-5.6 Terra](https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.6-terra), served…

        + Large 1,050,000-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
        Read full OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro review →
        10
        OpenAI: GPT-5.6 TerraPaid$2.50/1M tokens

        OpenAI

        GPT-5.6 Terra is a balanced model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 series, positioned between the flagship Sol tier and the…

        + Large 1,050,000-token context window, bigger than most models listed here+ Built-in reasoning (chain-of-thought) mode for harder problems+ Accepts images as input (vision-capable)
        Read full OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra review →

        A scorecard for the AI age vs top alternatives

        A side-by-side look at how A scorecard for the AI age stacks up against its closest rivals.

        FeatureA scorecard for the AI ageOpenAIClaudeAnthropicChatGPTOpenAIGeminiGoogle DeepMind
        Quality score / 109.6 / 109.5 / 109.2 / 10
        Starting priceSee site$20/mo$20/mo$20/mo
        Free tierNoYes — Free tier availableYes — Free tier availableYes — Free tier available
        API input price$2 / 1M tokens$1 / 1M tokens$1.5 / 1M tokens
        API output price$10 / 1M tokens$6 / 1M tokens$9 / 1M tokens
        SpeedFastFastFast
        Context window200K tokens128K tokens1M-2M tokens
        CategoriesChatbots & LLMsChatbots & LLMs, Coding, WritingChatbots & LLMs, Coding, WritingChatbots & LLMs, Coding, Writing
        Key features
          • Industry-leading long context (200K+ tokens)
          • Artifacts for live previews
          • Strong agentic coding (Claude Code)
          • Vision and document analysis
          • Multimodal text, image and voice input
          • Advanced data analysis (code interpreter)
          • Custom GPTs and GPT Store
          • Web browsing and real-time search
          • Up to 2M token context window
          • Deep Google Workspace integration
          • Native video and audio understanding
          • Real-time Google Search grounding
          Pros
            • + Best-in-class long-document reasoning
            • + Natural, high-quality writing
            • + Strong safety and reliability
            • + Most polished and widely supported ecosystem
            • + Excellent general reasoning and coding
            • + Huge third-party integration support
            • + Massive context window
            • + Tight integration with Google ecosystem
            • + Generous free access
            Cons
              • No native image generation
              • Fewer consumer integrations than ChatGPT
              • Usage caps on the most capable models
              • Can be verbose and overly cautious
              • Quality can be inconsistent on edge cases
              • Privacy concerns for some users

              Frequently asked questions

              Q. Is A scorecard for the AI age free?

              No — A scorecard for the AI age is a paid tool, starting at See site.

              Q. How much does A scorecard for the AI age cost?

              A scorecard for the AI age starts at See site. Pricing and features change often, so confirm current rates on the official site.

              Q. What is A scorecard for the AI age best for?

              A scorecard for the AI age is a chatbots & llms tool from OpenAI.

              Q. What are the best A scorecard for the AI age alternatives?

              Popular alternatives to A scorecard for the AI age include Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini and Thinking Machines: Inkling. Each trades off price, quality and ecosystem differently.

              Q. Is there a free alternative to A scorecard for the AI age?

              Yes. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini offer a free tier, making them good starting points if you want to avoid an upfront subscription.

              Q. Why switch from A scorecard for the AI age?

              Common reasons include pricing, specific feature gaps, data-privacy requirements, or simply wanting a tool that fits your stack better.

              How we rate AI tools

              Our quality score weighs capability on real tasks, breadth of features and integrations, pricing and value, and how actively the tool is maintained. Scores are editorial guidance, not benchmarks — always trial a tool on your own workflow before committing. Pricing and features change frequently, so verify current details on the official site.

              Ready to try A scorecard for the AI age?

              Start with the official plans and upgrade as you grow.

              Visit A scorecard for the AI age